Previous Entry | Next Entry

Freedom of the press in Qatar

  • Jun. 11th, 2009 at 11:08 AM
piss christ
Mr. Q over at ILoveQatar.net posted an Al Jazeera story on some local workers not getting paid:



It's cheering to see Al Jazeera pointing out injustices here in Qatar, and not just in neighboring states (even if they do it in an appalling surfer dude accent).

In more chilling news, the Shura Council just called for more stringent punishment for "Qatar-based journalists who write against the ruler, national security, religion and the Constitution," on the grounds that "Qatar’s social and religious values must be preserved at any cost." Very disappointing. The Peninsula almost immediately posted a rebuttal editorial.

I myself think that the Advisory Council should be "stringently punished" for defying the stated emir's desire for press freedom. They're defaming the Qatari Constitution!

Percentage of the world's population who enjoy freedom of the press, according to Freedomhouse.org.
Less flippantly, freedom of the press is one of the Western values I have most come to appreciate and cherish through living somewhere where it is still a work in progress. If people can't talk openly about what's going well and poorly, how on earth can they improve their society? If people can't question each other's political and religious views, even in potentially offensive ways, how can any of us learn and grow and think and change our minds?

We take for granted in the U.S. that I can say "Bush is a stupid, idiot hick" or "Obama is a smug, smarmy elitist," and while I'll definitely offend somebody, I won't get prosecuted for it. I can insult your religious views and you can insult mine, and the conversation will no doubt get heated and we'll all hate each other at the end, but nobody will end up in jail.

We don't appreciate that as much as we should.

Tags:





Comments

( 6 comments — Leave a comment )
[info]provoca7eur wrote:
Jun. 11th, 2009 08:47 am (UTC)
That accent was horrible, he sounds 16. Why would they let him read the story like that? So strange. But I'm happy to know they are telling the true stories now.
[info]qatar wrote:
Jun. 11th, 2009 09:01 am (UTC)
I am ashamed to say I giggled through the entire segment. But I looked Casey Kauffman up, and he's not 16 -- you can see him at the end of this segment.
[info]provoca7eur wrote:
Jun. 11th, 2009 10:18 am (UTC)
Ah, okay. I watched and it makes more sense.
Perhaps Americans sound funny once out of the States for a while.
[info]y_pestis wrote:
Jun. 11th, 2009 12:48 pm (UTC)
His Wikipedia entry is interesting - was his really the report that started pointing out how nasty the Republican campaigners were getting?

(Aside: There's really a columnist at the Washington Post called Colbert I. King? I wonder whether his first name is pronounced "Cole-bert" or "Cole-bear"?)
[info]dubaiwalla wrote:
Jun. 11th, 2009 09:57 am (UTC)
I'm going to have to take issue with that graph; broad categories like 'partly free,' which lump India in with Egypt, obscure more than they reveal. But I couldn't agree more with the general thrust of your post. (No 'that's what she said' jokes kthxplz.)

Edited at 2009-06-11 09:57 am (UTC)
[info]qatar wrote:
Jun. 11th, 2009 10:55 am (UTC)
Yeah, that map started a big discussion in my office about Egypt, which I would never in a million years call "partly free" in terms of freedom of the press. There are also significant differences between the "free" countries; I am appalled that denying the Holocaust is a criminal offense in much of Europe, but that's not enough to bump them down a notch. Such categories are rather arbitrary, but my point was merely that we should not take for granted that freedom of speech/press is something everyone has.
( 6 comments — Leave a comment )